History

Section of John White's 'Virgenia Pars' map. Click on the image to see a larger view in a new window. The original is part of a collection held by the British Museum. The contrast of this digital image has been enhanced by Coastal Carolina Indian Center to improve the map's legibility.

Editor’s note: As news trickled in late last week and over the weekend regarding the latest discovery beneath the patches on the John White ‘Virgenia Pars’ map, I immediately knew I wanted to speak to Scott Dawson, the most knowledgeable expert on the so-called ‘Lost Colony’ that I know. And let me be very clear — to say Mr. Dawson is the most knowledgeable person I know on the subject is not a claim I make lightly. I have been involved in researching early coastal Carolina history for nearly two decades. I have done research with, and for, more than one ‘group’ promoting itself as focused on the ‘Lost Colony’, and have become disenchanted with the recurrent theme in such groups of having agenda-driven theories that are weakly supported by cobbled-together, cherry-picked pieces of data, attempting to prove a desired historical interpretation, rather than allowing the data to all come in and then forming hypotheses from said data.

In my observations over these last many years, it appears much of the historical hullabaloo relating to the Lost Colony is more about drumming up publicity and headlines, followed by more ‘research dollars.’

Scott Dawson, on the other hand, is a Hatteras island native who, himself, is a descendant of the very Croatoan Indians who figure so prominently into the Lost Colony history. For him, research into the subjects of both indigenous history, as well as Indian-Colonial relations in early North Carolina is a labor of love. He knows the history of Hatteras, Roanoke and the surrounding areas with a level of familiarity and detail that I’ve not found elsewhere. His ability to recall the most minute details of even the lesser-known historical sources is truly impressive. He advocates strongly for investigating and teaching Coastal Carolina Indian history, and has expressed how troubled he is that there appears to be little interest in academia in researching the First People of our coast — unless, of course, the research can somehow be linked to the English settlers of the ‘Lost Colony.’ — S.W.


New Mystery Fort… Lost Colony?

by Scott Dawson

The new discovery on John White’s 1585 map is exciting, but the connection between it and the 1587 ‘lost’ colony is not supported in the primary sources.  The fort is far more likely to be connected with the 1585 voyage, and was possibly never even built.

In archaeology, everything is about context, and in history, the same thing is true.

In the current media, a lot of hype has been made about a cherry-picked phrase from one of John White’s writings stating a possibility of the colony moving “50 miles into the main” from Roanoke Island.

I would like to take this opportunity to explain the context, and then to dispute the recent claims of the press regarding the 1587 colony.

A Modern-Day Example

I am going to start you out with an analogy — one that you can ponder before I present the historical facts from the primary sources.

Imagine you are married with kids.

Your spouse and children are going to meet you at a restaurant that evening for dinner.

You cannot ride with them because you are coming from work to meet them.  Before you left for work earlier that morning, there was some talk of going to Café 12 in Avon.

You have to come home to change clothes first before meeting them for dinner, so you ask your spouse to leave a note of what restaurant they decide on, and you will meet them there.

You come home from work to change clothes and find a note that says, “We’re going to the Shipwreck Grill in Buxton.”

What do you do?

Will you head on over to the Shipwreck Grill, or the Café 12?

The answer is obvious. You’d go to the Shipwreck Grill. It would make no sense to go to one place when your family has left you a note that they’ve gone to another place.

Café 12 has the same context as the now over-hyped phrase “50 miles in to the main” (or Bertie County).  Shipwreck Grill represents Croatoan, or modern day Hatteras Island from Buxton to Hatteras Village.~

I am now going to present to you what is being ignored, and has been ignored for far too long — the actual FACTS and CLUES surrounding the ‘lost’ colony. [Continue reading…]

By Sara Whitford

I have been asked this, and similar questions, multiple times over the years because of my connection with Coastal Carolina Indian Center, as well as my role as the Group Administrator for the East Carolina Roots DNA Project. I figured it was finally time to write a post about it for anyone who is interested.

It is a question I always have to answer with a question:

“How can one match DNA to the Lost Colonists, or even the Indians of Croatoan, definitively, considering there are no genetic samples from which a contemporary subject’s results could be compared?”

Let me explain the simplest reasons first, and then we’ll get into the more complex reasons later. [Continue reading…]

John Lawson on the ‘Lost Colony’ of Roanoke

January 6, 2012

What follows is an excerpt from John Lawson’s A New Voyage to Carolina (p. 62)   First Colony of Carolina. The first Discovery and Settlement of this Country was by the Procurement of Sir Walter Raleigh, in Conjunction with some Publick-spirited Gentlemen of that Age, under the Protection of Queen Elizabeth; for which Reason it was [...]

Read the full article →

Tuscarora Ascendancy

December 15, 2011

This article which appeared in the October 1982 issue of The North Carolina Historical Review, was written by Dr. Thomas Parramore (former Meredith College professor and one of the most knowledgeable and thorough historians to have ever written about the Indians of eastern North Carolina.) This piece is frequently cited for its in-depth information on [...]

Read the full article →

“Death of a Reservation”

December 15, 2011

Excerpt from The Tuscaroras, Vol. 2 by F. Roy Johnson. This excerpt from a chapter in Johnson’s book discusses the demise of the Tuscarora reservation in Bertie County at Indian Woods, and the exodus from the reservation by Tuscaroras to the north and other areas of North Carolina.

Read the full article →

The Meherrin-Susquehannah Connection

December 15, 2011

An interesting entry from The Colonial Records of North Carolina, Second Series – Volume VII – Records of the Executive Council – 1674-1734. This entry describes a petition by the Meherrin to have land surveyed for them to be assigned a reservation, and a second petition from local inhabitants claiming that the Meherrin have not [...]

Read the full article →

1766 Tuscarora Land Lease

December 15, 2011

From The Colonial Records of North Carolina (Second Series): Records of the Executive Council 1755-1775. Cain, Robert J. (Editor) Division of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources, Raleigh. 1994.

Read the full article →

Letter from Governor Dobbs to North Carolina General Assembly in regards to pending “French-Indian War”

December 15, 2011

A message from His Excellency Arthur Dobbs, Esq; Captain-General and Governor in Chief, in and over his Majesty’s Province of North-Carolina. To the General Assembly, held at Newbern, the twelfth day of December, 1754. [Proposing] a plan of union with all the British Colonies, for our mutual future defence [Newbern Printed by James Davis, 1754].

Read the full article →

Craven County, North Carolina – Its Origin and Beginning

December 15, 2011

by Dr. Charles R. Hollowell (Includes Tuscarora Peace Treaty of 1712)

Read the full article →

Extracts from the Discoveries of John Lederer

December 15, 2011

From Hawks’ History of North Carolina, Vol. 2. “In three several Marches from Virginia to the west of Carolina, and other parts of the Continent; begun in March, 1669, and ended in September, 1670. Collected and translated out of Latin from his discourse and writings, by SIR WILLIAM TALBOT, Baronet. Printed in London, in 1672.”

Read the full article →

Laws Regarding Servants and Slaves

December 15, 2011

Describes early colonial North Carolina laws in reference to indentured servants and slaves, particularly in regards to race. For instance, the unfortunate, innocent child born to a white servant woman while under indenture was placed into bondage at birth until age 31. For getting pregnant during her indenture, she would be bound to serve an [...]

Read the full article →

Letter from Col. Pollock to Lords Proprietors regarding the ongoing war with the Indians

December 15, 2011

Describes the worried state of the colonials in the wake of the death of Gov. Hyde, and in the midst of the “Tuscarora War.” Also has an example of the common colonial reference to all Indians belonging to the Haudenosaunee as “Senecas.”

Read the full article →

Indian Settlements in the Post-War Era

December 15, 2011

Brief descriptions from Hawks’ History relating to the various settlements (reservations/territories) specified for Indian use in the post-Tuscarora War era.

Read the full article →

North Carolina Resolutions against Bay River Indians, Tuscaroras and their allies

December 15, 2011

This series of orders from the North Carolina Colonial Record (Second Series, Vol. VII) – 1711-1712, explains the colonies intentions against the Tuscarora and Bay River Indians in the wake of the September 22, 1711 Indian revolt against the colonists along the Neuse and Pamlico Rivers.

Read the full article →

1699 Articles of Agreement with the Bay (Bear) River Indians

December 15, 2011

From the North Carolina Colonial Record. Agreement between chief men of the Bay River Indians and colonials assuring the that the Indians would have no trouble with the English provided they assist them in various manners and turn over any Indians who have, or were planning to commit crimes against the English to English authorities [...]

Read the full article →

Entries Regarding the Indian Revolt of 1711

December 15, 2011

From Hawks’ History of North Carolina, Vol. 2. Gives descriptions of the events surrounding the Tuscarora and allies revolt and attack upon the colonists along the Neuse and Pamlico Rivers. (Hawks had reprinted these from the Colonial Records.)

Read the full article →

Selected Excerpts from Hawks’ History of North Carolina, Vol. 2.

December 15, 2011

Selections relating to the period of the Tuscarora War (1711-1713). Tuscaroras, Senecas, Meherrins, Mattamuskeets and Englishmen refusing to serve in the war against the Tuscaroras and their allies are mentioned.

Read the full article →

Excerpt from the Journal of John “Tuscarora Jack” Barnwell

December 15, 2011

According to Barnwell, Fort Hancock was designed for the Tuscaroras by a “runaway negro” slave named Harry. Also in this entry (representing one single day of Barnwell’s long campaign against the Tuscarora) Barnwell insults and condemns the local Palatines who had participated with him in his assault on the fort by calling them “cowards” and [...]

Read the full article →

Saponi Lands in Eastern North Carolina

December 15, 2011

Information on mid-18th century Saponi lands in present-day Wayne County. Includes Cliffs of the Neuse State Park (est. 1945.)

Read the full article →

The Trial of Christoph von Graffenried & John Lawson

December 15, 2011

An excerpt from von Graffenried’s Account of the Founding of New Bern. Details the journey made by Lawson and von Graffenried into Tuscarora territory, including their capture, trial, and the execution of John Lawson.

Read the full article →